debut: 11/30/17
10,958 runs
In reply to TanteMerle
I'm not saying that there hasn't been an increase in the use of analysis commensurate with the increase in easily available technology, but nikhil was getting on like all players had to rely on in the 80s and 90s was memory. Which doesn't make sense to me. For example, bowlers like tertius bosch and other SA pacemen were successful against the WI from the first game the WI played against them. How did that happen, especially for guys who never even played in county cricket(only AD had a contract with the Bears). I'm saying there was enough technology for players to figure out players' weaknesses. There wasn't the official team analyst position but as i said, tapes on players were easily available everywhere except in the WI. Its only in the WI that little home video footage of WI series in the 80s wasn't and is not available. All Pakistan and india games were broadcast live by their respective state broadcasters, which is why you can find footage of test matches in india from 1982 come foward, but you cannot find footage of(or it is extremely difficult to find) footage of say Allan Border's hundred at QPO that inspired a young Brian Lara in 1984, or Patrick Patterson's frightening spell in 1986 vs England(the rest of the story is a highlights reel which the BBC put together at the end of every day's play). There is probably ten minutes of footage left from probably the greatest series ever between West Indies and Pakistan in 1988, ten minutes encapsulating the final day's play, whereas the WI's visit to Pakistan in 1987 was covered live in Pakistan thanks to their state broadcaster. So just because the WI was in the 1800s when the rest of the cricketing world were in or were attempting to be in the 1980s, that doesn't mean players weren't doing their homework and analyzing footage. Hoss Brian Lara, before the 1999 visit of the all conquering Australians watched hours of footage of his dismissals in SA and as a result that is why he was so succesful in that series