How easy!!!

"Livingstone I presume".

Cappo and Scammy bowled the unit poor.

Seales is not a white ball crciketer at this time.

The first game was an aberration.
Hingland not settled yet and a sticky wicket.

Today showed his true game.

Why did Cappo bowl Rutherford so early, when he moves the older balls.
Why did the cappo bowl Mootie and Chase so late.

Good game by Hingland.
Too slow batting by Hope.

In reply to TanteMerle

Endorsed 100%.

wi are missing a pair of quality wicket taking bowlers. the bowlers in this squad have problems putting the ball in the right place consistantly whether is alzharri, shamar, seales or shepherd. motie had a bad day he usually is better than what we saw today .i still don't think forde is the answer even though he picked up three today and chase is there to hold up a end if he gets wickets it is a bonus.

In reply to velo

Pierre is available as Hosein is not.

Why are we picking Seales

Many people here do not know cricket.

I say the par score on a good wicket is 350.

Imaging what the score could have been had Hope scored 20 or 30 singles in those 61 dot balls.

I did not watch the game, but 61 dot balls,
while Livingston struck at nearly 150?

Windies 3 bats over 50 with only 1 striking over 100% rate.
Hingland 4 bats over 50 runs and 3 over 100% (1 at 97%)

Par score was 350 and Windies could have easily made 370 if Hope up his strike.
61 dot balls in an ODI on a good wicket is extremely poor.

You people are too easily impressed and don't appear to have a clue about proper cricket analysis.

Seeing the score, I knew that Hingland had a good chance to win.

In reply to TanteMerle

You are at risk of being called a hater for saying it like it is.

Well, it says something about the WI when England second eleven is giving the WI first eleven a good fight, it could mean that the WI will have to play in the qualifiers to get into the next WC tournament

In reply to dayne

Could?