Message Board Archives

We will engage in a peaceful transfer of Power
(not burn the fcking house down)..I added this

In reply to ray

Dude the speech is in poor taste..she is outright calling Trump the enemy of the USA and all must fight him .

There is a time and place and she again misstepped..

In reply to Master_Blaster

You wanted her to lead a March to the Capital?
Please...
It was a solid speech

In reply to Master_Blaster

If DJT had used "fight" the amount of times she did he would have been roasted.

A 10 minute powderful speech, wouldn't you say?

In reply to ray
Ok...I did not see it that way..
She even implied that Joe stepped down too late..not taking responsibility.

In reply to Master_Blaster

She full of class, Trump still claiming he won 2020, did he call Biden... talk about poor taste!

In reply to BeatDball

better than rambling 5 hours saying sheer shit

In reply to Master_Blaster

Where did she imply that?
Stop putting words in her mouth

In reply to camos

Dude Trump is jackass..rise above
I.hope she some takes responsibility for this loss

In reply to ray Bai, are you serious? Steups. Lemme go watch my TV westerns. Fool stop.

In reply to Master_Blaster

What responsibility should she take?

In reply to ray

"We did well in 137 days" ...she is implying it was not able nought time... wasn't she and Joe campaigning since the beginning?

In reply to ray

Any leader does ..are you implying she did not make mistakes?

In reply to Master_Blaster

Everybody makes mistakes, but I don't see where made a mistake that cost her. Seems the electorate was just voting Dems this year

In reply to Master_Blaster

In reply to Master_Blaster

Kamala Harris, the incumbent vice president of the United States, announced her 2024 campaign for president on July 21, 2024.....you needed to add 30 days to bolster your argument?

In reply to ray

any thing bout Jan 6?

In reply to ray

And there my people is what one of your loyal LBGY Liberal supporters just said.

No wonder why we cannot have any meaningful conversations because they just don't understand what leadership is all about. I was going to say this is poor by ray, but it is really "piss poor' and epitomizes the selfishness of the Democratic Party.

In reply to ray

Love her passive aggressive speech. Lots of blame game and lack of accountability. A shame tho. The Simpsons seh a "woman president will follow Trump." Maybe she'll win if she runs again.

In reply to DukeStreet

AOC saying 2028 is her time. The horses already trying to get ahead in the stable

In reply to Prako

Could be. I could see AOC doing it.

In reply to DukeStreet

If AOC runs I will dust off my robes

I luv that woman

I want to have her babies

In reply to DukeStreet, sudden

A young face could be beneficial.

She is one of the up-and coming in the Party. This is the time when the leadership needs to pick about 5 potentials and groom them for President and VP.

Use the lessons learnt from this election and start building from now. Obviously in 2028 the Republicans will have a new candidates (could be 2 younger guys like Vance and De Santis) as well.


I like the energy by my brother sudden

In reply to Prako



Coming from a weirdo cultist I will take that

Seems she was high on something. I don’t blame her. She needs courage to face supporters. Still sending signals to fanny Letitia and Bragg to continue

In reply to Prako

AOC and also Wes Moore. Young governor in Maryland. He has yardie roots and they are definitely grooming him also.

In reply to DukeStreet

Too Obamaish

I want an angry woman

Either AOC or Crockett

In reply to sudden

Crockett too ghetto lol

In reply to sudden

After two of the most qualified women ran for the office and lost, are you guys still thinking a woman can become president anytime soon? What did they say was the definition of insanity again?

In reply to sudden, DukeStreet

Lol - they will need to get public relations personnel to soften that image.

If they identify Crockett it will be an either/or not the two of them on the same ticket. Now having said that, AOC/Crockett vs Vance/De Santis will be interesting

I could see though AOC being a VP choice if Kamala goes up again on the Presidential ticket. However, I am not sure what was Kamala's thought process for picking Waltz this year - he didn't add anything to the campaign.

In reply to Runs

You got a good point bro. What if Trump screws up royally and people are just looking for anything new and different? Would AOC stand a chance, being Latina and trying to galvanize a base of young voters, especially the burgeoning and mercurial Latino base? If she had a good enough message, aligns herself with a solid running partner (white male for leverage) and some momentum, anything's possible. The fickle white female base is always going to be a problem.

In reply to Runs

Don't know if that is the best superlative description.

They were void of ideas on the Economy which was the most important issue. Additionally in Kamal's concession speech she talked about "building community" how can you build a community if your main emphasis was killing innocent children? How can you build a community if you spend tax payers money to support Trans gender procedures, how can you build a community if you are anti-life?

Kamal didn't tell the people what she did for 4 years - that is what we wanted to hear. If you can't tell me what improvements you did in 4 years, why should I believe you are going to change in the next 4? As the incumbent party you need to say what you did and that is what she was incapable of doing.

In reply to Prako

The US economy is roaring, go do some research. DT inherited such from Obama also, watch him tout the US economy and stock market as his doing when he takes office. Those not doing so well need to get off their butts, retrain, retool, just ask JD what they did after the jobs closed in his neck of the woods.

PS another bs pushed is she achieved nothing in 4 years, she was not the president, what did Pence and Quayle achieved? The veep’s position is mostly ceremonial, attending heads of state funerals and such in case you did not know.

In reply to Runs

Not disputing the economy (I am on board with your statement) - but why didn't the Democrats use that to their advantage in their manifesto?

Challenge is housing - and they sidestepped what they would do on that.

Bro - there are some basics that affect the man in the street and if you don't let the common man know what you are doing, you aren't going to get anywhere.

In reply to Prako

Addressed in another thread

All of a sudden she looked old.

In reply to DukeStreet

We will never see another black President in our lifetime. That’s one of the reason Kamala lost. Not even Dem primary voters really want dat. Notice how Kamala and Patrick Deval fared in Dem Primaries. Leadership and delegates had no choice but to support Kamala in this case but…

In reply to Prako

I said the above earlier today and Bernie Sanders just came out with this:

Bernie Sanders