debut: 11/13/02
2,225 runs
i just think now that Greaves give the 4th option, why not use the opportunity to play the spinner
- edited -
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
Greaves is in, why Roach
debut: 11/26/06
62,124 runs
In reply to bird
I hope after that partnership...your question has been answered
I hope after that partnership...your question has been answered
debut: 8/14/19
487 runs
In reply to powen001
A batting partnership does not answer a bowling question.
A batting partnership does not answer a bowling question.
debut: 11/26/06
62,124 runs
In reply to b4u8me2
If greedy wait.... Hot will cool
We still batting bro
If greedy wait.... Hot will cool
We still batting bro
debut: 2/22/04
8,482 runs
In reply to powen001
Are you saying that Warrican't could not have made a 50?
Is Warrican't not a better batsman than Roach?
I hope after that partnership...your question has been answered smile
Are you saying that Warrican't could not have made a 50?
Is Warrican't not a better batsman than Roach?
debut: 2/22/04
8,482 runs
In reply to tc1
Please check yourself.
Warrican't is about equal or better than Roach.
Also he seems to have shown some serious maturity this year.
Please check yourself.
Warrican't is about equal or better than Roach.
Also he seems to have shown some serious maturity this year.
- edited -
debut: 11/26/06
62,124 runs
In reply to TheTrail
I tell myself...They treated Mickey Holding the same way.
I believe the only bowler to escape this level of ingratitude was Malcolm Marshall...but I could be wrong...I joined this MB post his death and Social Media didnt exist when he was laid to rest either.
I tell myself...They treated Mickey Holding the same way.
I believe the only bowler to escape this level of ingratitude was Malcolm Marshall...but I could be wrong...I joined this MB post his death and Social Media didnt exist when he was laid to rest either.
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
Search
Live Scores
- no matches