Message Board Archives
HEADLINE: Reifer cleared of CWI charges relating to Super50 Cup Final
CaribbeanCricket.com
2025-04-04 22:33:25
The Disciplinary Committee of Cricket West Indies (CWI) have stated than any attempt to lay charges against Barbados Pride all rounder Raymon Reifer after the non-playing of the CG United Super50 Cup final was a nullity.
This is due to the Match Referee having no jurisdiction to hear such charges, a source told Sportsmax.tv on Friday afternoon.
The ruling came after a meeting on Friday afternoon with the written decision set to come on Monday.
Cricket West Indies have also been ordered to pay Reifer’s legal costs.
Read more at SportsMax
Full Story
natty_forever
2025-04-05 00:07:40
In reply to CaribbeanCricket.com
And them charge Campbell, dont?
Castled
2025-04-05 01:01:47
Cricket West Indies have also been ordered to pay Reifer’s legal costs.
Reifer's lawyers shouldn't stop there. They should go after the full prize monies for 1st and 2nd places for the hardworking players. Make the incompetent CWI pay the combined prize package to the Bim/Jam teams who made it to the Final.
tc1
2025-04-05 01:52:54
Campbell had no representation and therefore plead guilty
Castled
2025-04-05 14:28:38
In reply to tc1
Why ?...lawyers aplenty in Jamrock
openning
2025-04-05 14:43:30
In reply to tc1
Campbell wanted to play cricket after coming off an international band, this ruling is important to both teams.
Maispwi
2025-04-05 15:42:20
I never thought dat CWI had a case
ponderiver
2025-04-06 07:32:31
In reply to Maispwi
So the talented Jamaican was punished and the entitled Bajan was not wow
Inity
2025-04-06 07:41:20
In reply to ponderiver
Campbell's charges and suspension were immediately withdrawn.
Halliwell
2025-04-06 08:17:49
In reply to ponderiver
Shot bai!!!!
Maispwi
2025-04-06 21:53:37
In reply to ponderiver
The Jamaican Board didn't support him and advised him to accept the charges. Blame dem. Did dey concede so dey cud get matches in Jamaica?
Kay
2025-04-06 22:23:11
Why would Campbell retain a lawyer to seek justice against CWI? Isn't that the WIPA's responsibility to defend it's members in such instances?