Ball tampering and GHE players.

Should the Eagle players be sent to purgatory if the evidence found them guilty for: “ Applying saliva to a cricket ball is considered ball tampering under current International Cricket Council (ICC) rules. While previously common, the ICC made the ban permanent in September 2022, following a temporary ban during the COVID-19 pandemic. The reasoning behind the ban is to avoid potential health risks associated with saliva and to prevent any potential unfair advantages gained from using it to polish the ball.”

In reply to mikelegend

So, that is what all the big fuss is about??? Man, i could've swear they used sandpaper on the ball, the way VOR and the Tits carrying on!
That was probably an innocent mistake!

In reply to StumpCam

I don’t know if this is the case my friend. I am just putting this out there as a means to be more thought provoking than jumping to all sorts of conclusions and conspiracy theories.

Impact said it was sun block.

In reply to natty_forever

Still, if that were the case, it’s an action that is habitual to naturally wipe your face of perspiration and apply it to the ball. So, it’s not something totally contrary to the letter of law, but I do understand how they can be implicated!

In reply to StumpCam

I thought they interfered with the seam of the ball ....

In reply to Kay



I thought they interfered with someone's easy Trini wife!

To avoid all the speculations, the officials must release a statement detailing exactly what the transgression was with a follow up from the Harpy Eagles

Does saliva change the composition of the ball?

In reply to jacksparrow

what we need is a press conference with CWI officials (including the umpires) and GHE officials (including Imlach, Premaul and Sinclair) to answer all questions, provide evidence on both sides—so we can all determine if the punishment is justified or not so we can put this to bed once and for all. We need full transparency on this and let the chips fall where they may!!

In reply to Batbeforepad

The situation you’ve described raises a fascinating series of questions about accountability, evidence, and the psychology of decision-making in sports.

When players plead guilty, particularly in a sport as passionately followed as cricket, it could indeed suggest that the evidence against them was compelling. Cricket, like many sports, thrives on integrity, and the rules are often upheld with meticulous scrutiny. Umpires, match referees, and discipline committees are tasked with ensuring that the spirit of the game is not compromised.

But why would players plead guilty if they had the chance to argue their case?

Overwhelming Evidence
It’s highly likely that there was irrefutable evidence—perhaps video footage, witness testimony, or data from the match itself. In such cases, pleading guilty might be a strategic decision to demonstrate remorse and cooperate with authorities, potentially receiving a reduced sentence.

Public Perception
Fans hold the game sacred, and any hint of dishonesty or rule-breaking can tarnish reputations permanently. By pleading guilty, players might hope to show accountability, rebuild trust, and salvage what’s left of their careers.

Legal Advice or Pressure
Professional athletes often consult legal advisors or team representatives before making decisions. Perhaps they were advised that a guilty plea would be the most pragmatic route, especially if contesting the charges could lead to harsher penalties or prolonged scrutiny.

Emotional Factors
Guilt, regret, or even exhaustion from prolonged investigations might lead players to concede. The mental toll of defending oneself in such a high-stakes environment could be a factor in their decision.

Do Cricket Fans Influence Sentences?
While fans don’t directly determine sentences, their influence on the sport’s governing bodies can’t be ignored. Cricket boards and committees are acutely aware of public sentiment. If fans demand stricter punishments for rule violations, committees may feel pressured to hand out harsher penalties to maintain the sport’s credibility.

Social media amplifies this phenomenon—fans now have a platform to voice their opinions loudly and swiftly. Trending hashtags, heated debates, and widespread criticism can indirectly sway decision-makers. However, the disciplinary process is designed to remain impartial and evidence-based, shielding it from excessive external influence.

Cricket’s beauty lies not just in its technicalities but in the values it upholds. When players falter, the game’s ecosystem—fans, officials, and governing bodies—works together to ensure that justice is served, preserving the spirit of this beloved sport.

Sarge

They are all innocent
Because they didn’t kill nobody

In reply to Halliwell

Bro, if it were that egregious of a crime, you don’t think Trinidad would have launched a formal protest of the outcome?? Sheesh!

In reply to StumpCam

Stumpy...

Why would T&T protest? The players pleaded guilty.

It's up to CWI to determine the outcome.

How many stakeholders protest have resulted in changes....NONE

Go and read what the T&T coach said.

In reply to StumpCam

Exactly!!!
This is my point

Time to
Move on