debut: 4/11/19
133 runs
In reply to Windiesfan78
So very close!
So very close!
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
Come on West Indies women
debut: 10/20/21
7,919 runs
In reply to PM
So much could be said about why we didn't qualify but it is what it is.
So much could be said about why we didn't qualify but it is what it is.
debut: 11/14/02
19,659 runs
In reply to Windiesfan78
They made their bed HARD by losing to Scotland..Scots ? Should not have been.
But it's cricket/
They made their bed HARD by losing to Scotland..Scots ? Should not have been.
But it's cricket/
debut: 11/13/02
64,119 runs
In reply to Chrissy
Nice try…but Pythagoras miscalculated big time..WI Women should have batted 1st…that was their best chance to improve their net run rate
Nice try…but Pythagoras miscalculated big time..WI Women should have batted 1st…that was their best chance to improve their net run rate
debut: 10/20/21
7,919 runs
In reply to FanAttick
The Cricket West Indies website backs that up. Cricbuzz is not a reputable site.
The Cricket West Indies website backs that up. Cricbuzz is not a reputable site.
debut: 11/14/02
19,659 runs
In reply to FanAttick
net run-rate was 0.013 behind Bangladesh, according to Misinfo.
When you lose to Scotland bad things will ensue and has.
net run-rate was 0.013 behind Bangladesh, according to Misinfo.
When you lose to Scotland bad things will ensue and has.
debut: 11/14/02
200,126 runs
In reply to hubert
Dat simple - we needed a six and a four - we did not get it done.
Dat simple - we needed a six and a four - we did not get it done.
debut: 11/14/02
200,126 runs
In reply to Emir
Yep - we did not get it done although we broke several records trying and came real close.
We needed to get 160 in 10 overs
Yep - we did not get it done although we broke several records trying and came real close.
We needed to get 160 in 10 overs
- edited -
debut: 8/9/14
18,814 runs
In reply to Chrissy
Sad!!! but this was not the game that caused it. The shocking Scotland match was the real reason. In addition, when big margin of defeat to Pakistan pushed the rr down.
Sad!!! but this was not the game that caused it. The shocking Scotland match was the real reason. In addition, when big margin of defeat to Pakistan pushed the rr down.
- edited -
debut: 1/1/04
12,787 runs
In reply to Chrissy
Wrong! That was the reason they lost!
Dat simple - we needed a six and a four - we did not get it done.
Wrong! That was the reason they lost!
debut: 11/30/09
35,324 runs
In reply to Chrissy
Runs Scored: 20
1 6 2 W1 4 6
Score after 10 overs
WIW 156-3
9.6
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, SIX
9.5
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, FOUR
9.4
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, out Campbelle Run Out!! 1 run completed Campbelle run out (Laomi/Thipatcha Putthawong) 9(5) [4s-1]
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, THATS OUT!! Run Out!!
9.3
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, 2 runs
9.2
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, SIX
9.1
Thipatcha Putthawong to Campbelle, 1 run, to third man
We needed to get 160 in 10 overs
Runs Scored: 20
1 6 2 W1 4 6
Score after 10 overs
WIW 156-3
9.6
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, SIX
9.5
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, FOUR
9.4
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, out Campbelle Run Out!! 1 run completed Campbelle run out (Laomi/Thipatcha Putthawong) 9(5) [4s-1]
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, THATS OUT!! Run Out!!
9.3
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, 2 runs
9.2
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, SIX
9.1
Thipatcha Putthawong to Campbelle, 1 run, to third man
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
Search
Live Scores
- no matches