The Independent Voice of West Indies Cricket

Come on West Indies women

Page: previous  1
PM 4/19/25, 2:55:28 PM
PM avatar image

debut: 4/11/19
133 runs

In reply to Windiesfan78

So very close!
Windiesfan78 4/19/25, 3:00:22 PM
Windiesfan78 avatar image

debut: 10/20/21
7,919 runs

In reply to PM

So much could be said about why we didn't qualify but it is what it is.
hubert 4/19/25, 3:03:17 PM
hubert avatar image

debut: 11/14/02
19,621 runs

In reply to Windiesfan78

They made their bed HARD by losing to Scotland..Scots ? Should not have been.
But it's cricket/sad
FanAttick 4/19/25, 3:30:39 PM
FanAttick avatar image

debut: 11/13/02
64,068 runs

In reply to Chrissy

Nice try…but Pythagoras miscalculated big time..WI Women should have batted 1st…that was their best chance to improve their net run rate
shivnotout 4/19/25, 3:37:27 PM
shivnotout avatar image

debut: 11/30/09
35,314 runs

In reply to FanAttick

windies made it

points table

+ 0.919
Chrissy 4/19/25, 3:37:51 PM
Chrissy avatar image

debut: 11/14/02
199,911 runs

In reply to Windiesfan78
So close
Chrissy 4/19/25, 3:39:39 PM
Chrissy avatar image

debut: 11/14/02
199,911 runs

In reply to FanAttick
Good point
shivnotout 4/19/25, 3:45:04 PM
shivnotout avatar image

debut: 11/30/09
35,314 runs

In reply to Chrissy

chrissy. windies have a better run rate with 1 ball to spare

points table
FanAttick 4/19/25, 4:17:00 PM
FanAttick avatar image

debut: 11/13/02
64,068 runs

In reply to shivnotout

Are you sure?
- edited -
Windiesfan78 4/19/25, 4:27:11 PM
Windiesfan78 avatar image

debut: 10/20/21
7,919 runs

In reply to FanAttick

The Cricket West Indies website backs that up. Cricbuzz is not a reputable site.
FanAttick 4/19/25, 4:30:22 PM
FanAttick avatar image

debut: 11/13/02
64,068 runs

In reply to Windiesfan78

Indeed
hubert 4/19/25, 6:24:35 PM
hubert avatar image

debut: 11/14/02
19,621 runs

In reply to FanAttick

net run-rate was 0.013 behind Bangladesh, according to Misinfo.
When you lose to Scotland bad things will ensue and has.sad
Chrissy 4/20/25, 12:08:54 AM
Chrissy avatar image

debut: 11/14/02
199,911 runs

In reply to hubert
Dat simple - we needed a six and a four - we did not get it done.
Emir 4/20/25, 12:15:39 AM
Emir avatar image

debut: 8/9/14
18,800 runs

In reply to hubert
Is that the official result?
Chrissy 4/20/25, 2:05:08 AM
Chrissy avatar image

debut: 11/14/02
199,911 runs

In reply to Emir
Yep - we did not get it done although we broke several records trying and came real close.
We needed to get 160 in 10 overs
- edited -
Emir 4/20/25, 10:57:08 AM
Emir avatar image

debut: 8/9/14
18,800 runs

In reply to Chrissy

Sad!!! but this was not the game that caused it. The shocking Scotland match was the real reason. In addition, when big margin of defeat to Pakistan pushed the rr down.
- edited -
natty_forever 4/20/25, 12:49:52 PM
natty_forever avatar image

debut: 4/28/03
60,410 runs

In reply to Emir

Just wasn't deserving.
StumpCam 4/20/25, 1:13:44 PM
StumpCam avatar image

debut: 1/1/04
12,751 runs

In reply to Chrissy

Dat simple - we needed a six and a four - we did not get it done.

Wrong! That was the reason they lost!lollol
shivnotout 4/20/25, 4:07:21 PM
shivnotout avatar image

debut: 11/30/09
35,314 runs

In reply to Chrissy

We needed to get 160 in 10 overs


Runs Scored: 20
1 6 2 W1 4 6

Score after 10 overs
WIW 156-3

9.6
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, SIX

9.5
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, FOUR


9.4
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, out Campbelle Run Out!! 1 run completed Campbelle run out (Laomi/Thipatcha Putthawong) 9(5) [4s-1]

Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, THATS OUT!! Run Out!!

9.3
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, 2 runs

9.2
Thipatcha Putthawong to Chinelle Henry, SIX

9.1
Thipatcha Putthawong to Campbelle, 1 run, to third man
Page: previous  1