debut: 2/16/17
39,320 runs
"From Dominance to Defeat: How the PNM Lost Its Way in 2025"
As I describe below, a combination of leadership choices, strategic errors, and a lack of connection with their supporters led to the PNM's disastrous collapse in 2025.
Aloofness and Internal Secrecy
The PNM's internal culture grew more exclusive over time, alienating the typical voter. This lack of openness bred suspicion and gave the impression that the party was isolated from the problems that the general public faced.This opacity was further demonstrated by decisions such as the Tobago secret caucus vote that appointed Mr. Young as the new prime minister. People began to doubt the party's intentions and feel left out of important processes.
Key Leadership Changes Occurring At Odd Times
The public had lost faith in Mr. Fitzgerald Hinds' leadership, and the administration had long been beset by rising crime, so his late removal as Minister of National Security was viewed as too little, too late.
Mr. Colm Imbert's reassignment from the finance ministry, where he was well-known, caused unrest during a period when economic stability was essential.
The timing of Dr. Rowley's resignation as prime minister was bad, even though it was probably required for internal party renewal. Because it fell during a crucial election cycle, the party was frantically trying to come together under new leadership.
Unpersuasive Advertising and "New Chapter" Storyline
Under Mr. Young, the slogan of "new chapter" seemed hollow, especially since it was not supported by a track record of observable successes. When the electorate could cite unfulfilled promises from the previous nine and a half years, the promises of an efficient ministry, better infrastructure, and a bolstered export sector sounded hollow.
The campaign appeared to be unimpressed with its own record, suggesting that there was little to celebrate, rather than showcasing accomplishments like the new hospital in Port of Spain or the airport in Tobago. Voters began to doubt the veracity of future pledges as a result of this failure to build on prior achievements.
Embracing Dissident Opposition
The PNM's core supporters were displeased when former UNC members like Mr. Larry Lalla, Mr. Dinesh Rambally, and Mrs. Anita Haynes-Alleyne joined the party. Despite their seeming political savvy, these people did not align with the PNM's long-standing ideology.
This tactic backfired because it made the PNM seem desperate and diluted their identity. While undecided voters perceived the party as opportunistic rather than visionary, loyalists believed it was compromising its values to obtain an advantage.
Ignorance of the UNC's Momentum
Instead of offering a proactive vision for the nation, the PNM's campaign strategy seemed more concerned with undoing the UNC's victories ("the rising sun"). The PNM appeared to be on the defensive as a result of this reactive strategy, which is more appropriate for an opposition party than one that is running for reelection.
The PNM unintentionally raised the profile of their opponents and supported the UNC's story of change by focusing their weapons on the UNC without adequately highlighting their own accomplishments.
Complacency and Arrogance
After decades of dominance, the PNM’s governance style was often perceived as dismissive and arrogant. This attitude alienated not only swing voters but also some within their traditional base who felt taken for granted.
The lack of humility in addressing citizens’ concerns and the failure to acknowledge where their policies had fallen short bred resentment. The damage was already done when the election was unexpectedly rescheduled for April 28th, which further unnerved the electorate.
This loss might be a turning point for the PNM. Opposition time could encourage the reflection required to reestablish the party's base and reestablish a connection with the voters. Humility, openness, and a sincere attempt to meet the needs of the people must replace the haughtiness that characterized their tenure. Only then will they have a chance to win back the public's confidence and respect, which will guarantee their continued relevance in the political landscape.
But for the time being, the PNM must accept the repercussions of its decisions and acknowledge that maintaining power calls for more than just tradition; it also calls for flexibility, sincerity, and a strong dedication to serving the people.
Sarge
As I describe below, a combination of leadership choices, strategic errors, and a lack of connection with their supporters led to the PNM's disastrous collapse in 2025.
Aloofness and Internal Secrecy
The PNM's internal culture grew more exclusive over time, alienating the typical voter. This lack of openness bred suspicion and gave the impression that the party was isolated from the problems that the general public faced.This opacity was further demonstrated by decisions such as the Tobago secret caucus vote that appointed Mr. Young as the new prime minister. People began to doubt the party's intentions and feel left out of important processes.
Key Leadership Changes Occurring At Odd Times
The public had lost faith in Mr. Fitzgerald Hinds' leadership, and the administration had long been beset by rising crime, so his late removal as Minister of National Security was viewed as too little, too late.
Mr. Colm Imbert's reassignment from the finance ministry, where he was well-known, caused unrest during a period when economic stability was essential.
The timing of Dr. Rowley's resignation as prime minister was bad, even though it was probably required for internal party renewal. Because it fell during a crucial election cycle, the party was frantically trying to come together under new leadership.
Unpersuasive Advertising and "New Chapter" Storyline
Under Mr. Young, the slogan of "new chapter" seemed hollow, especially since it was not supported by a track record of observable successes. When the electorate could cite unfulfilled promises from the previous nine and a half years, the promises of an efficient ministry, better infrastructure, and a bolstered export sector sounded hollow.
The campaign appeared to be unimpressed with its own record, suggesting that there was little to celebrate, rather than showcasing accomplishments like the new hospital in Port of Spain or the airport in Tobago. Voters began to doubt the veracity of future pledges as a result of this failure to build on prior achievements.
Embracing Dissident Opposition
The PNM's core supporters were displeased when former UNC members like Mr. Larry Lalla, Mr. Dinesh Rambally, and Mrs. Anita Haynes-Alleyne joined the party. Despite their seeming political savvy, these people did not align with the PNM's long-standing ideology.
This tactic backfired because it made the PNM seem desperate and diluted their identity. While undecided voters perceived the party as opportunistic rather than visionary, loyalists believed it was compromising its values to obtain an advantage.
Ignorance of the UNC's Momentum
Instead of offering a proactive vision for the nation, the PNM's campaign strategy seemed more concerned with undoing the UNC's victories ("the rising sun"). The PNM appeared to be on the defensive as a result of this reactive strategy, which is more appropriate for an opposition party than one that is running for reelection.
The PNM unintentionally raised the profile of their opponents and supported the UNC's story of change by focusing their weapons on the UNC without adequately highlighting their own accomplishments.
Complacency and Arrogance
After decades of dominance, the PNM’s governance style was often perceived as dismissive and arrogant. This attitude alienated not only swing voters but also some within their traditional base who felt taken for granted.
The lack of humility in addressing citizens’ concerns and the failure to acknowledge where their policies had fallen short bred resentment. The damage was already done when the election was unexpectedly rescheduled for April 28th, which further unnerved the electorate.
This loss might be a turning point for the PNM. Opposition time could encourage the reflection required to reestablish the party's base and reestablish a connection with the voters. Humility, openness, and a sincere attempt to meet the needs of the people must replace the haughtiness that characterized their tenure. Only then will they have a chance to win back the public's confidence and respect, which will guarantee their continued relevance in the political landscape.
But for the time being, the PNM must accept the repercussions of its decisions and acknowledge that maintaining power calls for more than just tradition; it also calls for flexibility, sincerity, and a strong dedication to serving the people.
Sarge
- edited -
