Supreme Court 'distraught' as Trump uses ruling

How could they not have seen this coming?

here

In reply to birdseye


The justices thought by so ruling they were amassing power unto themselves and underestimated the depths of evil within that bastard DT, even after he spoke out that he wanted to get rid of the constitution. It was all there, they chose to ignore it. Ketanji Brown warned them that a president so empowered would throw caution to the wind. And now they are all seeing it unfold before there very eyes. I wonder what its like being in that court when its time for deliberations as these cases come up. Wonder how many I told you so both said an unsaid and these justices must by now realized the flawed, erroneous and bad law they created.

In reply to carl0002

Unitary Executive inna dem rass. Those idiots thought it only applied to executive powers relative to congress. Apparently it never occurred to them that they were ceding judicial power to the executive as well

FAFO!
Dat is all.

It’ll be a a great day for the echo chamber when it can finally share news and opinions that aren’t just pumped out by rabid liberal propaganda machines. Maybe that could finally free the echo chamber from its narrow, one-sided thinking.

In reply to VIX

What liberal view(s) have you espoused/ promoted on this forum?

In reply to carl0002

When you say “the justices”, I hope you are not including those two bastards, Thomas and Alito. Those two are firm believers in the MAGA worldview.

They would sell the constitution down the drain, as long as they can get their piece of the action.

In reply to VIX

For your information, rights are rights, and the constitution provides for those rights, which are constantly stymied by those who would seek to deny them to all who strive for them.

As is Trump’s aim to make MAGA, by taking us back to a time when it was the right for white people to be in total control, seeking any rights for “the Negroes” to co-exist on an equal footing with whites would have been considered woke and, as you term, views “pumped out by rabid liberal propaganda machines”.

Such slurs should not deter people from seeking their right to co-exist equally under the constitution, whether their efforts are deemed woke or not.

In reply to Casper

I was referring to the conservative majority which would include those 2 bastards.

In reply to birdseye

I’m very liberal in my personal views, but I’m more conservative when thinking about what’s best for society. Does that help?

In reply to Prowi

New Study Reveals Why Trump Is So Popular Among Minority Voters

If there ever was intellectual bullshit and contradictory nonsense being masked as some enlightened higher level awareness this got to be it.

In reply to carl0002
Well, this here backroom is the bullshit capital, led by an unrepentant, delusional, irrelevant echo chamber of misfits.

So it’s all good. Now carry on and go search for more Trump things to become outraged over. Copy-paste here, and join the circle-jerking mob.

In reply to VIX

If its so much bs why are you here. No one here, except perhaps you, thinks this is a grand exercise in intellectual discourse and thinking. This is how you describe those who do not subscribe to whatever it is that floats your boat - "unrepentant, delusional, irrelevant echo chamber of misfits." but you are here...then surprised when you get called out on your bull$hit.

In reply to VIX

Most if not all your posts seem to create an internecine paradigm for the sub-set of society called “Caribbeancricket.com” --- how can that be ”best" for any society, irrespective of makeup?

In reply to birdseye

Birsdeye what the ass that word mean
Don't fall for that Vix trap. We not posting for the Nobel peace prize for literature no matter how hard he tries make it appears so in his head.

In reply to birdseye

Those fancy words are beyond my pay grade.

In reply to carl0002

I didn’t make it up - — ask AI ��

In reply to birdseye


I wasn't saying you made it up

internecine - destructive to both sides in a conflict.