debut: 2/16/17
40,774 runs
In reply to googley,BeatDball
Let’s start by acknowledging that both religious and non-religious individuals (and groups) have, at different times in history, been responsible for acts that caused harm, as well as acts that brought about immense good. Human history is intricate, and it’s difficult—if not impossible—to draw a clean line separating “religious” from “non-religious” actions, motivations, or outcomes.
Religious people:
Throughout history, religions have inspired both profound acts of compassion and moments of violence or oppression. Examples of harm include the Crusades, Inquisitions, various religious wars, and persecutions. However, religion has also been a force for peace, charity, education, and social justice—think of figures like Martin Luther King Jr., Mahatma Gandhi, or countless unnamed individuals quietly serving their communities.
Non-religious people:
Secular ideologies have also been responsible for significant harm, particularly when they become dogmatic or authoritarian. The 20th century saw regimes such as Stalin’s Soviet Union, Mao’s China, and Pol Pot’s Cambodia—explicitly atheist or secular governments—commit atrocities on a massive scale. Yet, non-religious philosophies have also promoted human rights, scientific progress, and movements for equality.
A more nuanced view:
It’s worth noting that the root causes of harm often lie less in religion or its absence, and more in universal human tendencies: the desire for power, fear of the “other,” tribalism, and the capacity for both empathy and cruelty. Religion and secularism can be tools—used for good or ill depending on the people wielding them and the circumstances in which they’re used.
There isn’t a clear “winner” or “loser” here. Both religious and non-religious people have left complex legacies, marked by both great harm and great good. The real challenge lies in understanding our shared humanity and working to build systems—religious or secular—that promote compassion, justice, and peace.
Sarge