debut: 1/20/04
91,849 runs
...Why should one be legally stumped off such a delivery?
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
If a wide is an illegal delivery...
debut: 7/22/22
1,024 runs
In reply to voiceofreason
A better question would be - why can one be stumped off a wide but not a no-ball? It's important to emphasise stumped as opposed to run out, because the batsman, sorry, batter, is not aiming in this scenario to score runs, in which case, of course, the dismissal by run out would equally apply.
A better question would be - why can one be stumped off a wide but not a no-ball? It's important to emphasise stumped as opposed to run out, because the batsman, sorry, batter, is not aiming in this scenario to score runs, in which case, of course, the dismissal by run out would equally apply.
debut: 5/14/05
24,700 runs
In reply to KTom
You can be stumped off a wide until it is so wide that it landed off the pitch and became a no ball then you can’t be stumped, irregardless
of how agile and acrobatic the keeper might be.
You can be stumped off a wide until it is so wide that it landed off the pitch and became a no ball then you can’t be stumped, irregardless
of how agile and acrobatic the keeper might be.
debut: 9/18/09
897 runs
In reply to WI_cricfan
If a farmer has no farming certificate, why should he be allowed to farm?
If a coach has no coaching certificate why should be allowed to coach?
If a farmer has no farming certificate, why should he be allowed to farm?
debut: 1/20/04
91,849 runs
In reply to WI_cricfan
A young man with a Bachelors degree in Finance comes back and gets a job at a bank only to be supervised and taught by a senior bank employee who has no bachelor degrees.
A young man with a Bachelors degree in Finance comes back and gets a job at a bank only to be supervised and taught by a senior bank employee who has no bachelor degrees.
debut: 10/12/11
3,582 runs
In reply to voiceofreason
...Why should one be legally stumped off such a delivery?
Would give batsmen too much
All they gotta see is a ball on leg and they would know they free to chance advancing down the wicket
...Why should one be legally stumped off such a delivery?
Would give batsmen too much
All they gotta see is a ball on leg and they would know they free to chance advancing down the wicket
debut: 3/16/21
12,802 runs
In reply to Halliwell
No, you cannot be out on a free hit unless you are runout.
No, you cannot be out on a free hit unless you are runout.
debut: 1/1/04
12,981 runs
In reply to voiceofreason
Because it’s a similar situation to being run out off a no ball! You/team has already been credited with an extra run, but that’s is not enough, you want more freely???
Because it’s a similar situation to being run out off a no ball! You/team has already been credited with an extra run, but that’s is not enough, you want more freely???
debut: 2/4/03
16,510 runs
Because a wide does not mean that the ball is dead, and batsmen can be dismissed once the ball is not dead.
The apparent anomaly has been exaggerated by the artificial definition of a wide in white ball cricket where a ball an inch outside the legside is deemed to be a wide.
The apparent anomaly has been exaggerated by the artificial definition of a wide in white ball cricket where a ball an inch outside the legside is deemed to be a wide.
debut: 1/20/04
91,849 runs
In reply to Maispwi
So why has the play not ended on the wide decision where a run is a given?
This encourages bowlers to bowl wide/negative length to force batsmen to over balance for the stumping.
So why has the play not ended on the wide decision where a run is a given?
This encourages bowlers to bowl wide/negative length to force batsmen to over balance for the stumping.
debut: 2/4/03
16,510 runs
In reply to voiceofreason
The dead ball law would need to be changed so that the ball becomes dead at the call of an illegal delivery.
It would therefore mean that the batting side would not be able to benefit from any additional runs or extras that were available . That would mean that batters would not be able to hit no balls and keepers and fielders wouldn't have to worry about diving or chasing to prevent extras off of such deliveries.
The dead ball law would need to be changed so that the ball becomes dead at the call of an illegal delivery.
It would therefore mean that the batting side would not be able to benefit from any additional runs or extras that were available . That would mean that batters would not be able to hit no balls and keepers and fielders wouldn't have to worry about diving or chasing to prevent extras off of such deliveries.
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
Search
Live Scores
- no matches