FuzzyWuzzy
7/14/25, 10:54:29 PM
debut: 6/1/05
56,307 runs
No1 vs No9.
No batter stood out. HS 75 wi 71 Oz
Wi fast bowlers bowled well to contain Oz
Oz superior fast bowlers decimated our weaker batting.
sudden
7/14/25, 10:55:29 PM
debut: 11/27/06
54,412 runs
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
true but was still despicable
InHindsight
7/14/25, 10:55:56 PM
debut: 2/24/07
12,247 runs
Aptly put
openning
7/14/25, 10:58:47 PM
debut: 11/13/02
44,905 runs
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
It is good to hear from you, bro.
imusic
7/14/25, 11:03:12 PM
debut: 11/13/02
80,516 runs
In reply to FuzzyWuzzy
Welcome back
You were missed
PalsofMine
7/14/25, 11:18:08 PM
debut: 2/2/23
2,273 runs
i agree. My take is that we actually outperformed Australia. We played to par (cannot bat a 4th innings to save our lives) but Australia played very much under par (not a single century in a 3 test series). Therefore we outplayed them by basically bringing them down several levels (which nevertheless was enough to put a severe cuttail on us).
Halliwell
7/15/25, 5:27:13 AM
debut: 5/14/05
24,785 runs
In reply to PalsofMine
Hopefully you can use these skills in Politricks!!!!!!
3-0 and record lows
