debut: 5/29/07
8,772 runs
The team needs another wicket-taking bowler. However, who will that bowler replace?
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
A Strike bowler short
debut: 1/12/06
9,535 runs
In reply to dayne
The team selected was the right one, Russell just had perhaps his worst game ever.
And of course that terrible collapse
The team selected was the right one, Russell just had perhaps his worst game ever.
And of course that terrible collapse
debut: 1/1/04
13,078 runs
In reply to DIEHARD
What!
We need bowlers who can bowl variations!
Alzarri is too one dimensional, plus the Aussies love pace!
What!
We need bowlers who can bowl variations!
Alzarri is too one dimensional, plus the Aussies love pace!
debut: 3/6/20
4,883 runs
In reply to dayne
We lost tactically....
Sending Russell..ahead of Rutherford.. Russell consumed 8 balls for 9 runs..
His first over cost 19 runs....made him bowl in the 10th over.... Australia 79/4...gave away 18 runs... momentum of the match changed...
It was not Russell fault....It was Data crash....
We lost tactically....
Sending Russell..ahead of Rutherford.. Russell consumed 8 balls for 9 runs..
His first over cost 19 runs....made him bowl in the 10th over.... Australia 79/4...gave away 18 runs... momentum of the match changed...
It was not Russell fault....It was Data crash....
debut: 5/29/07
8,772 runs
In reply to Onionman0
Yes, Rutherford came in too late, Russel's bowling is not consistent enough to depend on him for 4 overs, they will play him again in the next match as that will be his farewell, so if they are really serious about winning, they might have to drop a batter to bring in a bowler or give Chase more overs
Yes, Rutherford came in too late, Russel's bowling is not consistent enough to depend on him for 4 overs, they will play him again in the next match as that will be his farewell, so if they are really serious about winning, they might have to drop a batter to bring in a bowler or give Chase more overs
debut: 3/16/21
12,902 runs
Don't know why you guys so overrateposr 2015 Russel so much. He has dine very little for WI since.
debut: 11/11/24
195 runs
In reply to VIX
Russel must play, it’s his farewell game.
Ford should be in for Powell, since Powell is playing in his last series.for WI.
Russel must play, it’s his farewell game.
Ford should be in for Powell, since Powell is playing in his last series.for WI.
- edited -
debut: 12/26/07
34,958 runs
In reply to Edrich
So you don't think that when $ammy gets inevitably fired, Powell will be his natural replacement as short form captain?
Ford should be in for Powell, since Powell is playing in his last series.for WI.
So you don't think that when $ammy gets inevitably fired, Powell will be his natural replacement as short form captain?
debut: 1/20/04
91,976 runs
In reply to Drapsey
So you don't think that when $ammy gets inevitably fired,
Ok Mr. Shallow.
So you don't think that when $ammy gets inevitably fired,
Ok Mr. Shallow.
debut: 1/12/06
9,535 runs
In reply to StumpCam
They selected the right team based on the squad, if they had picked Shepherd y'all would be calling him runs truck.
No one in their right man would consider Russell a step down from Forde, given Russell's experience and track record post 2015.
Strategy was where we lost, bowling changes and tactics employed by both batsmen and bowlers, and of course Andrew's dropped catch sealed the deal
They selected the right team based on the squad, if they had picked Shepherd y'all would be calling him runs truck.
No one in their right man would consider Russell a step down from Forde, given Russell's experience and track record post 2015.
Strategy was where we lost, bowling changes and tactics employed by both batsmen and bowlers, and of course Andrew's dropped catch sealed the deal
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
Search
Live Scores
- no matches