In reply to carl0002
Yes, only conservative politicians in history have lied. Ever. So the Murika misfits say.
Your idiotic comment shows how deep you and the other delusional misfits have swallowed cherry-picked liberal talking points and internet conspiracies. Step back from the rabid partisan spin. Step out of the circle-jerking echo chamber now and then. Most of what you're saying is based on misunderstandings, misquotes, or plain lies.
The cult-like belief from misfits on both sides that everything is fake news unless it fits their view is exactly why people stay misinformed. Start questioning your sources and yourself, not just your political enemies.
Anyway, I had no clue what those random points were meant to prove besides you being misinformed and delusional. I had to go find real info, since the echo chamber clearly can’t think for itself.
Perplexity.ai:
Economic data revisions happen routinely under all administrations; this is normal statistical practice and not proof of "cooking the books." Claims about the government exaggerating fraud, waste, and savings from $18 million to $18 billion have no credible evidentiary support, and the removal of certain figures from websites likely reflects updates or corrections, not evidence of deceit.
Regarding the claim about the president allegedly inflating renovation costs from $2.1 billion to $3.1 billion: fact-checks have clarified that the increased figure includes costs related to a previously completed building, so the headline presentation lacks context and does not prove intentional inflation.
About Medicare/Medicaid cuts, the situation is complex. While the administration has stated no cuts were made, independent reports and lawsuits by hospitals and providers highlight payment reductions and ongoing challenges in Medicare payments, including physician pay cuts of around 2.8% in recent years, which risk impacting services. Cuts to administration offices servicing Medicare also create indirect hardships for beneficiaries. This is not simply a lie but an area of legitimate policy debate and impact.
Claims that tariffs are paid solely by countries are inaccurate: economists agree that tariffs generally raise costs borne by consumers and importers, regardless of which party nominally pays the tariff to the government.
The DOJ's handling of the Epstein files has involved legal and procedural complexities, but no conclusive proof exists that the administration intentionally suppressed material. Statements about available files have changed with ongoing investigations, not from malfeasance.
Finally, accusations of the current or past presidents committing treason require extraordinary evidence and have never been substantiated. Labeling these claims as "fake news" aligns with fact-checkers and legal assessments.
Har harr harr, perplexity AI offered this unprompted wrt your post
In sum, the speaker appears heavily influenced by partisan and liberal-opposition narratives that selectively present facts or misunderstand complex matters. A better approach is to engage with vetted sources, official documents, and non-partisan fact-checks to break free from echo chambers and ideological "cults." This fosters a more informed, balanced evaluation rather than relying on incomplete or misleading claims.
