debut: 3/18/05
332 runs
I try to make sense out of all I heard in that interview. I get the impression that Haden believed that he was entitled to a contract. When that was not the case and he was asked to come down to sign to be eligible for the draft 5 hours before, he did not go because, how could they expect him to make decisions about his career in 5 hours? What is he doing now?
He is upset that his own Antigua did not give him a chance, and how it hurts to see others from outside coming in, while he sits. But, were we not told that the franchises are not national teams, but owned by foreigners, whose investments are, first, to make a profit, and they pick whoever they wish within the given guidelines?
He says that he sees these youngsters perform well and get contracts, and because of no facilities, next year they are not given another contract. I am puzzled by that, because where were they playing well, in the first case, to have impressed to get picked? Did those facilities just disappeared once they were contracted.
Somebody in this thread asked, "when a player get dropped, what does he do, go home?" I ask, "was a player picked for life, or was he picked to perform at a certain level?" A player knows well that his place on any team is not permanent. This talk about cricket career is short is a poor argument. If new, better players emerge, are they supposed to not get picked because some other player has an entitlement to a place until 40 years old?
I hope Mr Haden Walsh believes that he is good enough, and is motivated to work on his game to improve it, and to attract attention, in the region and outside. When you get a call to play in the Leagues in England, nobody in England owes you anything. If you play good cricket, you ill get recalled or new offers. It all depends on you, and no one else.