WI Selection Panel- For the Ignoramuses.

Sammy is not the sole Selector so quit peddling this myth!


Please to educate yourself

A Modernized Scouting Network

Through CWI’s recently appointed Senior Talent Managers, Jamal Smith (Male) and Ann Browne-John (Female), there will now be a dedicated and robust responsibility for managing senior player data, collaborating with analysts, and assisting in selection decisions. They will work alongside six TTIDs, each assigned to a specific region:

Barbados – Henderson Broomes
Guyana – Ramnaresh Sarwan
Jamaica – Delroy Morgan
Leeward Islands – Samuel Spencer
Trinidad & Tobago – Gibran Mohammed
Windward Islands – Craig Emmanuel

[b]In reply to voiceofreason[/b
You are a shameless liar who is telling us not to believe what our eyes see. Who interpret the data collected into picks to the squad? Go put your head in a crocus bag.

@voiceofreason

VOR there are lackeys who are clueless and regurgitate much of the propaganda.

The other group are well aware and are the master spinners of 'doodoo'

Those guys are responsible for identifying talents in the region... nowhere did it state that the players that they identified will be selected by the lone selector.

They could identify all that they want but the final decision remains with the fraudulent one... he has the final say on who makes the team.

If you don't believe that then ask Joshua DaSilva... because if they were picking based on 'data' as they claim he would've been one of the first names in the test squad.

If they were actually using data then guys like Jewel and Carty would not be in any T20 squad... Carty won't even be in a test squad either.

On a side note... de fraudulent can't even plan a practice session. According to the players, Reifer and Griffith gotta do it. No wonder he can't go anywhere without them

In reply to anthonyp



You all and this Josh Da Silva who averages 25 after 33 tests. Again, domination at Dungheap is not the only criteria. BTW Jahmar Hamilton never got a lookin but don't hearr you folks griping about him. What about Carlon Bowen Tuckett?

If they were actually using data then guys like Jewel and Carty would not be in any T20 squad... Carty won't even be in a test squad either:

In reply to anthonyp



It is called delegation Dude. That is why Griffith was assigned the Nepal job that he failed miserably at.

@anthonyp

Well said.

@voiceofreason

How many WI current players has an average over 40? 50? 35? That you picked out Joshua. Jangroo should be in the test squad and ODI squad not in a T20 squad. He is not the prototype T 20 player. Carty should not be in any squad. This is a Trini saying this eh.
Mayers and Allen same. They have passed their expiry dates to be beneficial to the future of WI cricket.
Sampson should have been in the team and a couple young ones who showed promise.

@anthonyp

And the coach can only work with what he is given.

Meanwhile your hommies brought WI cricket to the abyss

Resuscitation is near impossible.

The horses have bolted

....how else you want mevto describe it

In reply to rillo

It is amazing this infatuation with Josh Dasilva, when he wasn't the only one that scored runs in the R4D and was not selected. What makes him more special than Jahmar Hamilton? Carlon Bown- Tuckett?

BTW we already have Imlach and Hope.

In reply to voiceofreason

Lol do you seriously read the crap that you post? Or yuh head so far up Sammy's behind that yuh can't even smell the fresh air?

Using your stupidity... why did they recall Chase and Hope to the test squad? Both played more matches than DaSilva and got similar averages. What data did the fraudulent one use to select them?

How could a player with a FC average in the 20s walk into the test squad and you got no issue with that? They adding intangibles? But you got issues with a dude who averaged 64+ in the last season.

If performance does not matter then what data are they actually collecting? Clap per min? How fast you could walk from the pitch to the dressing room?

In reply to InHindsight

Lol the fraudulent one is the one selecting the squad.

Imagine the most hated player in the region is now considered a savior... all yall does cuss and fret when he's selected. So what's the issue if he choose not to play? Why didn't the fraudulent one consider Motie? For all you know the others decided to pull out because of the treatment given to their teammate.

Plus who needs the Guyanese players when you got the likes of Auguste.. the new Mr. Cricket

In reply to voiceofreason



Maybe where you're from they refer to it as that.. to the rest of the world its called incompetence. How could someone be a head coach and they can't even plan a practice session?

In reply to anthonyp



Again Idiot. They are not simply using scorecards and statisitcs for selection. Read and comprehend please. Again a player could well average 64 in R4D with the majority of his runs coming against weaker bowling teams or him being afforded numerous chances. I have no time with your level of stupidity that you cannot understand that simple. The idea of selecting players based on statistics alone is a flawed one.


Savior my ass. Sammy and the Selectors should stop making him feel that way. He is a head case who has regressed terribly on the international stage but to say he would have made a difference is no guarantee but what the team needed was some stability and by having to recruit 9 new players that did not help.



You just vex that your tape ball legend did not get selected. Don't worry about Auguste, he will come good.

@voiceofreason




One can see why the Windwards are yet to produce a great international player.