Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:44 PM
Deleted...
Deleted...
Subject: RE: BPL NOC Request
Dear Chris,
"...It is WICB’s position that, if a player wishes to play official cricket and to be considered for selection to play for the West Indies, and whether or not he signs a retainer contract, he must expect NOCs to be issued subject to international commitments, in accordance with the rules of the ICC which govern the overseas tournaments in which he wishes to play. WICB does not have the resources to match the amounts of money that players can earn from playing in the IPL and certain other overseas domestic tournaments. WICB's approach is to permit players to play in the IPL and other overseas domestic tournaments wherever possible, subject only to international commitments. This approach, in WICB’s view, has to be adopted for all players ("FTS Players" i.e. first team squad players) who are (or would be regarded as) members of the current first team squad and who purport to make themselves available for selection, and are eligible for selection (or, rather, not ineligible for selection for the foreseeable future), whether they have signed retainer contracts or not. If FTS Players were automatically granted unconditional NOCs for every overseas domestic tournament in which they wished to play, this would, in effect, allow any FTS Player to make himself available for selection for the West Indies only for matches where he could not find a better paid alternative.
WICB believes that asking an FTS Player who requests an NOC to play in an overseas domestic tournament to accept a condition that he make himself available, if selected, for international commitments which may clash with that tournament, is justifiable. If a player has no contractual obligation to WICB and does not wish to make himself available to play in international matches for which he may be selected, then he has the option of ceasing to be a FTS Player, by retiring from international cricket, or otherwise declaring himself ineligible and/or unavailable for selection for the foreseeable future. In that event, WICB would not consider it necessary or appropriate to issue a player with anything but an unconditional NOC.
So, Chris, it is your choice, whether you receive a conditional or unconditional NOC. But you cannot have an unconditional NOC and be considered for selection to play for the West Indies. Either you wish to make yourself available to play for the West Indies, in which case you must accept that NOCs will be granted to you on the same conditional terms as other international players, or you do not, in which case you can have your unconditional NOC. All that is required from you is a clear statement, one way or the other..."
................................
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 8:01 AM
Deleted...
Deleted...
Dear Ernest:
"I am in receipt of your January 17, 2012 E-mail. From the onset I must express my disappointment with your continued refusal to allow me to freely ply my trade, the imposition of unacceptable conditions and restrictions on the terms of my employment, and the continued attempts to manipulate my career, all while refusing to respond to my demands for an end to the WICB's tirade and an explanation in clear terms what exactly I have done to deserve this unacceptable treatment. At the end of the day, the WICB is playing with my professional development and livelihood for their own selfish gain..."
Those of you myopic posters better keep your other end shut. The visionary among us saw this coming from miles.
This was 2012 when most saw it from a purely "renstraint of trade perspective."
Allyuh have no legitimacy now to bemoan the shit West Indies cricket has become. SHUT THE "F" UP.