@Wasp

But out there looking give bowlers chances to setup others and not let them be 100%in the game mentally.it is not the best team strategy. That's Not Cricket.

See what I mean? He could have had 60 to 80 runs to his name with normal batting and we would have been closer to the follow on total. Terrible batting.

@WalterWhite

I value the time he spent at the wicket. I'd prefer if he'd converted has he's done in the past, modest though his average may be.

I have time for him.

In Lucian parlance, "epi dat is it"

My response to some wannabes on this MB - trying to sound smart by disparaging another.

You will observe that the time of day I start this thread. WI hadn't been at batting for even an hour.

I commented that Hodge was being a good foil.

And my statement was appropriate for the time. In the end Kavem spent an inordinately long time at the wicket will little runs to show. So he batted way too slow.

Dudes stop making fools of yourselves. You're not as important as you think

Smh