For various reasons, Narine’s Test career lasted only six games, in which he took 21 wickets at an average of 40.52. He was much more productive in limited overs cricket, as his strike rates of 21.25 in T20Is and 26.46 in ODIs suggest, compared to 78.5 in Tests.
This, of course, has no bearing on how Lawes might fare. He is a much different bowler with much different strengths and characteristics, and will pose different equations for batters to solve. He seems to possess the tools to succeed in all formats. His left-arm unorthodox style is a rare form of bowling that will pose rare problems for opposition batters. If he achieves a high level of precision he will be a real asset in cricket’s longest format. As it was in the ODIs, playing him will be something of a risk. But he has the goods to do a good job and the payoff could be grand.
West Indies cricket has been looking for match-winners. They do not come along often, and when they do they rarely arrive without uncertainty. Lawes could fail in Tests, but he also has the kind of skills that can help win Test matches. That possibility alone may justify taking the chance.
https://garfieldrobinson1.substack.com/p/why-vitel-lawes-should-play-in-pakistan