The Independent Voice of West Indies Cricket

Message Board Archives

Cameron .... The meeting went well

 
ponderiver 2016-08-25 23:36:11 

Board had nothing to do with Sammy's omission




What was the theme of the meeting?

Let me put it this way: The players were able to disseminate information they didn't have access to before... We'd also invited a retired player, Darren Ganga (who'd played between 1998-2008, to give his perspective on life after cricket... The views exchanged were frank. But, as I've said, the effectiveness of the hours spent together would be judged on how the team goes forward... If I had to describe the theme, it was how best to take West Indies cricket forward. All stakeholders have to work together.

Would there be a review after, say, six months?

Could be... Ideally, there should be a meeting at least once a year. We had one in 2013, in Florida itself, then in Barbados last year... This, then, was the third.

The meeting, which began at 9.00 am, got over around 1.30 pm, but I saw you come out with the Keiron Pollards as late as 4.00 pm... Did you meet some of the players separately? If so, why?

I did have an extended meeting with Wavell Hinds, the president of the West Indies Players Association (WIPA), Pollard and one or two more on getting the players to sit down with Hinds and to place their recommendations on the changes they'd like to the eligibility criteria.

WIPA, therefore, is a key player...

The Board deals with them.

What is the eligibility criteria?

To be eligible for Test cricket in the West Indies cap, you need to play our domestic four-day tournament... To play ODIs, you need to participate in our domestic 50-over competition... To be eligible for T20Is, you need to be available for the CPL. Playing in the CPL isn't a must as the franchises may not pick a particular player.

But should the selection criteria be so rigid?

That's a subject for our selectors to look at. The players, as I've mentioned, could give an input after sitting down with Hinds.

Generally, what did the players say on the eligibility bit?

From what I could gather, they'd like consistency in following the eligibility criteria. If there's a policy, it has to be implemented consistently.

That Sammy accepted the Board's invitation to attend was pleasing...

But why would Sammy not have been invited? He remains a part of the West Indies cricket structure. We'd invited all on retainer contracts... Denesh Ramdin also came, as did newer players like Roston Chase. We wanted all to come on board.

The impression one has is that the Board advised chief selector Courtney Browne to drop Sammy from the T20I squad. As the Board president, what are your comments?

That is a wrong impression, totally incorrect. The Board had nothing to do with Sammy's omission. In fact, Sammy himself asked Browne as to why he'd been dropped.

So Browne, too, was present at the meeting?

Yes.

 
natty_forever 2016-08-26 11:51:12 

Bump

 
Maispwi 2016-08-26 12:09:46 

In reply to ponderiver

Is Dave implying dat Sammy is on a retainer contract?

 
Walco 2016-08-26 12:24:46 

In reply to natty_forever

That meeting went as well as the meeting with CARICOM went smile spin doctor in full effect

 
natty_forever 2016-08-26 12:33:25 

In reply to Walco...

big grin

 
jacksprat 2016-08-26 12:41:37 

QUES-But should the selection criteria be so rigid?

ANS-That's a subject for our selectors to look at. The players, as I've mentioned, could give an input after sitting down with Hinds.

What kinda nonsense is this? Do the selectors set policy or aren't they obliged to follow guidelines out by the Board?

QUES-That Sammy accepted the Board's invitation to attend was pleasing...

ANS-But why would Sammy not have been invited? He remains a part of the West Indies cricket structure. We'd invited all on retainer contracts...

Does Cameron think the fans are stupid or suffer from amnesia?

As I recall, Sammy was not offered a retainer contract and when asked about it on Sportsmax, Cameron's reply was something along the line of, "Why should I retain a player who is only going to play 2 games a year for us?"

Who is he trying to fool?

 
natty_forever 2016-08-26 12:43:11 

In reply to jacksprat...

Who is he trying to fool?
... Voiceofahypocrit.

 
jacksprat 2016-08-26 12:45:07 

In reply to natty_forever

Waste of valuable time & effort!

Think of it, why try to fool a fool? big grin

 
Drapsey 2016-08-26 13:14:04 

Why was $ammy at the meeting?

Just happened to be hanging out with his former charges, would be my guess.

 
natty_forever 2016-08-26 13:22:18 

In reply to jacksprat...

Waste of valuable time & effort!
... as I am finding out.

 
VIX 2016-08-26 14:49:25 

However, what's important is how things go forward from now on

Said every board president for the last 20 years rolleyes

 
voiceofreason 2016-08-26 14:49:57 

Finally... Is the communication gap between the Board and the players a thing of the past now?

(Smiles ) We've tried to close the gap


Dastardly Dave again. Long as Wavell remains head of WIPA, the senior players will not trust him.

 
ponderiver 2016-08-26 16:50:49 

In reply to Drapsey



Why was $ammy at the meeting?


Slippery Sammy ..... er di ambassador, has a huge role to play in di future of our cricket.
future presi of di board big grin big grin big grin

 
imusic 2016-08-26 16:56:03 

Dave Cameron and Wavell Hinds...the 2 biggest con men in the history of west indies cricket

And even sadder...a good man like Michael Hall exclaiming beatitudes bout the virtue of Wavell "sell out" Hinds....confused