Check in at 9.00pm folks
Message Board Archives
Rachel Maddow tweet - got his tax returns
In reply to Chrissy
Sweet
He (Donald) probably found a way to cook the books...
In reply to Chrissy
The PussyGrabber-in-Chief is (for whatever reason) politically bulletproof.
If Maddow is telling the truth then he and his army of right wing retards will shift the narrative from "whatever malfeasance is discovered" to "Obama tapped my wires and Maddow is an accessory to the crime - lock her up!"
2005
In reply to black
Hahahahahahaha!
She got some good ratings out of that one.
In reply to SnoopDog
Nothing there.
They need to wait until they have complete and current tax information, instead of hyping it for ratings.
In reply to black
Assuming the PussyGrabber-in-Chief didn't leak the 2005 returns himself I could bet he was just about to shit his pants moments before she went on air.
Need to see the sources
Made Trump look good.
Probably leaked himself and may be the only good one, now he possibly gets this scrutiny off his back
In reply to Commie
damp squib .... hahahaha
Rachel Madcow purveyor of fake news for those want to consume ... that dude is delusional ....
In reply to Commie
wait until they finish with it
In reply to Chrissy
Chrissy, you really falling for this crap?
Trump leaked that 2005 2 pages himself.
Read the White House response. They set up Rachel for this big dud.
What is the relevance and connection of 2005 tax returns with 2017? Loud stttuuupppeeessss!!!!!!!!
Bear in mind that a taxpayer is only required to keep their tax records for 7 years.
Look at the response from Trump's son to the non news from Rachel.
This is all good news for Trump.
In reply to Star
his chess coach must be Russian ... deading wid laff
In reply to Star
I agree.
The only good thing about this is that his tax returns are back in the news.
In reply to birdseye
Looks like it's win-win for both Trump and Maddow, irrespective of the news or fake news.
In reply to DukeStreet
these people are comical
In reply to Chrissy
CRASH AND BURN
The Maddow guy got schooled by The Donald.
What a boring fool. MSNBC should fire this clown.
In reply to DukeStreet
Rachel and her think tank are too smart to not know this may have been a set up by forces loyal to the White House, and they said as much on the show yesterday.
There is more to this coming, Rachel is no fool.
In reply to Chrissy
Trump playing de media and allyu like a fiddle
In reply to Emir
No one is saying she is a fool.
We all know her educational background and her smarts but don't you think this nonsense makes her look silly?
Reminds one of the big news re "the Al Capone vault" that turned into a big yawn.
All hype and no substance.
In reply to Star
I am a big Rachel fan but this was totally stupid.
In reply to Star
The fact that you take an objective principle/entity and run it thru your thought process and print out a subjective result does not change the original object-tivity.
In reply to black
It's clear as daylight that the PussyGrabber-in-Chief leaked those 2005 returns.
Why? Because that was the last year he actually paid taxes (25% in proportion to his income) and that was the year he got into bed with Russia, Vlad and the Pissettes.
In reply to SnoopDog
Because that was the last year he actually paid taxes (25% in proportion to his income) and that was the year he got into bed with Russia, Vlad and the Pissettes
That's exactly what I was thinking.
It could backfire on him because it puts more pressure on him to release later returns.
In reply to black
Yeah. And it puts the release of his recent tax returns back into the spotlight where it belongs.
It also gives his supporters ammo, see he paid his taxes nothing more to see can we now move on
In reply to Runs
In 2005! How much has he paid since then? The one trillion Ruble question.
In reply to SnoopDog
Well you know how his spinmeisters obfuscate facts with alternative facts
In reply to Runs
Trump is the dictator America always wanted.
2005 Returns coming out now means nothing. Why 2005?
Why not something more recent? Unless the others have something that should not be divulged to the Public.
Trump was supposed to show his 2015 and or 2016 Returns. I will be satisfied if it showed he paid taxes as per normal and reported All income as per normal.
As to the source and/ or origins of that income will be a matter for Congress and the ethics committee.
In the meantime if he wants to go that far back, then show us the following years:
2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016.
Even my tax return has chnaged significantly in the last few years due to changes that has occurred in my life with the progress of time.
I would think that the same is true for most of us on this MB and more so for TRUMP>
In reply to SnoopDog
Sensationalism. It hurts her credibility.
But it seems she did the tweet b4 she saw the taxes. Cuz there is noway she would have spun it like that if that was not the case.
In reply to embsallie
His recent tax returns will disclose more than just his personal net earned income, the sources of that income, and how much taxes he paid on that net income.
His recent tax returns will more importantly disclose his personal debts and liabilities he is using to write off against his gross personal income. It will disclose what those debts are and the amount of the debts including disclosing any and all foreign bank accounts over $10,000.
Why is this important? His returns will confirm he is heavily indebted and therefore bound to the Russian oligarchs, including Putin, and that he may in fact be susceptible to blackmail and undue influence from these Russians. His recent tax returns will confirm that the lion's share of his income are from Russian sources. His recent tax returns will confirm that all his loans are from foreign banks because no bank in America will lend money to him. His recent tax returns will confirm that he's taken out a mortgage with the Bank of China for approximately $600 million dollars.
Now, having debts in and of itself is not a crime and I heavily doubt Trump can be impeached simply for having debts. But what his recent tax returns will show is that he snookered all and sundry during the election campaign. That he is deeply connected to Russia. That he's not the successful businessman he purports to be (pre-presidency since he and his family will make a shyteload of money during and post-presidency). That his presidency (and the country) could be compromised at any moment because he is so bound to the Russians and Putin.
It all depends on the Republicans. It's up to them to enact legislation requiring all members of the executive to disclose their prior 5 years tax returns. Fat chance that's going to happen.
In reply to SnoopDog
A+
In reply to SnoopDog
His recent tax returns will more importantly disclose his personal debts and liabilities he is using to write off against his gross personal income. It will disclose what those debts are and the amount of the debts including disclosing any and all foreign bank accounts over $10,000.
Why is this important? His returns will confirm he is heavily indebted and therefore bound to the Russian oligarchs, including Putin, and that he may in fact be susceptible to blackmail and undue influence from these Russians. His recent tax returns will confirm that the lion's share of his income are from Russian sources. His recent tax returns will confirm that all his loans are from foreign banks because no bank in America will lend money to him. His recent tax returns will confirm that he's taken out a mortgage with the Bank of China for approximately $600 million dollars.
Now, having debts in and of itself is not a crime and I heavily doubt Trump can be impeached simply for having debts. But what his recent tax returns will show is that he snookered all and sundry during the election campaign. That he is deeply connected to Russia. That he not the successful businessman he purports to be (pre-presidency since he and his family will make a shyteload of money during and post-presidency). That his presidency (and the country) could be compromised at any moment because he is so bound to the Russians and Putin.
It all depends on the Republicans. It's up to them to enact legislation requiring all members of the executive to disclose their prior 5 years tax returns. Fat chance that's going to happen.
In reply to RemainsUnknown
It's called having a brain. Sadly many Muricans, and immigrants like yourself, have lost yours.
In reply to SnoopDog
Remember what you were taught at school in August? Ignorance is bliss.
In reply to Star
No you are wrong - more and more folkswant to know what he's hiding.
His former ally Scarborough said Trump leaked this for diversion - that is not working - watch the ride and the wiretapping lies.
In reply to RemainsUnknown
Listen Bro. Fact is Muricans, including recent immigrants like yourself, have failed to be good responsible citizens in being so woefully uninformed and gullible to vote and put into office a professional con artist cum celebrity apprentice TV star who's only agenda is to enrich himself and his family and destroy all the great things that Muricans pride themselves on - ie. secular democracy, education, science.
And look at you for example. A recent immigrant who is so deeply hurt that others are critical of the once great U.S. and A. Suck it up snowflake and pay your taxes so the PussyGrabber-in-Chief can go golfing 2 weeks of every month in office.
In reply to black
No - it ties in with her investigation on the Russia links
In reply to Chrissy
There IS no investigation into the Russian connection.
The Republican congress has stated repeatedly that they are not prepare to investigate the matter because according to one of them "there is nothing there".
In reply to SnoopDog
In reply to Chrissy
No - it ties in with her investigation on the Russia links
What ties in with the investigation? There was nothing there.
This makes Trump look good.
In reply to RemainsUnknown
Shut up and pay your taxes you immigrant liberal leech.
In reply to black
Yet. The dots are there however. A thorough independent investigation should be able to obtain enough evidence to connect those dots.
That's why the Republicans don't want an independent investigation.
Trump paid 25%, Obama 19%, MSNBC 24%...This Done.
MADCOW got deceased!
NEXT!
In reply to nitro
How much did he pay to Putin, and the other Russian oligarchs he's indebted to - in 2016?
In reply to Chrissy
This guy is very sick--A sick individual. I am hoping they impeach him..
In reply to SnoopDog
PS. Golf is plenty fun, Snoopy; have you ever played?. I might see if I can go golfing at his courses and rub shoulders and grab Mel@nia.
Carry on ranting and raving and crying and bawling and screaming bloody murder like a lil school gurl. HAHAHAHA
While the rest of us have a hearty laff at fools like you.
Weren't I suppose to be blocked on my return from international travels? It took about 7 mins to pass through immigration. Choke on that.
Taxes? I'm happy to pay it. It's louses like you who don't think you should pay taxes and cry about it and who want to leech off the system.
Again, you got the liberal part WRONG!!!!
In reply to RemainsUnknown
No I didn't you Russian Putin loving commie immigrant moocher.
In reply to SnoopDog
Putin was right. His Russian girls he exported to 'merica are good.
I check them out from time to time at a certain Gentlemen's place I frequent.
In reply to RemainsUnknown
Do like the PussyGrabber-in-Chief and get your share of Russian golden showers Bro.
Now get back to work and pay your taxes you lazy fcuker.
In reply to SnoopDog
sounds like you prapah busy at work yourself. Hmmm...
PS. How's life in Buxton?
In reply to RemainsUnknown
Of course I'm busy at work Bro. I provide free education to imbeciles like you.
In reply to SnoopDog
But Snoops, if having a brain is synonymous with being smart then you are wasting that brain on a message board man....
In reply to Kay
Let him believe he's doing the world a favor by lifting up his skirt and crying here...
HAHAHAHAHA
In reply to Kay
It's the internet Bro. We don't communicate with one another by morse code cable anymore. Ask PussyGrabber-in-Chief to let go of his Twitter and hear what he says.
In reply to RemainsUnknown
And yet here you are ready to burst a blood vessel because I'm belittling your once great U.S. and A.
In reply to SnoopDog
Just remember while you're out here in the interweb bawling your lungs out... living in Buxton, PG-in-Chief couldn't have a better life.... matter of fact, before PGIC became president, life was great. Now it's greater and here you are..... weeping in some shit-laced, bacteria-infested, trench in Buxton.
Go dab ah bottom house or something similarly productive.
HAHAHAHA
In reply to SnoopDog
HAHAHAHA
In reply to RemainsUnknown
Admit it Bro. You cling to every word that I write on this MB.
It's ok. You'll learn a thing or two.
In reply to SnoopDog
It's ok. You'll learn a thing or two. big grin
laytah!
This idiot killed journalism. This is worst than the Stephen Glass case.
She should be fired!
In reply to nitro
Fired for what?
Rachel Maddow's show is not news.
BTW -- In 2005 The Orange One said he was a billionaire. Didn't see it on that tax return.
In reply to Trinidave
True that seemed to have gone over peeps heads
In reply to Runs
As conceited as de Orange One is, TriniD was tinkin dat dat is one of de reasons he didn't want to reveal his tax documents.
Ties with Russia and China may also be revealed.
In reply to Trinidave
I don't think his 2005 return would have revealed that, just what he made for the year.
In reply to black
TriniD just did some research.
Billionaire NOT
In reply to Trinidave
Wasn't he claiming 10 billion?
100 million a year won't get him there, assuming he gradually built up wealth.
In reply to black
Net Worth is not revealed in an income statement.
In reply to nitro
I said that.
I'm saying, he would have to make more than 100 million a year to accumulate 10 billion dollars or own a tech company.
Link Text
Feinstein hints
Search
Live Scores
- no matches