Cricket West Indies (CWI) regrets to announce that a quorum was not met for today’s pivotal meeting on governance reform, as the representatives of the Guyana Cricket Board (GCB) and Barbados Cricket Association (BCA) failed to attend having opted not to appoint two representatives as required by the company's Articles of Association. Guyana formally indicated their non-attendance, while Barbados did not provide a response. This marks the second time that both the GCB and BCA have opted not to attend a meeting of the members, the first instance occurring in 2021. All other Full Member shareholders from Jamaica Cricket Association (JCA), Leeward Islands Cricket Board (LICB), Trinidad and Tobago Cricket Board (TTCB), and Windward Islands Cricket Board (WICB) were present and prepared to proceed.
CWI President Dr. Kishore Shallow expressed disappointment over the absence of these two key shareholders stating,
"It is deeply disappointing that representatives from Guyana and Barbados did not see the importance of being present at this crucial juncture for the future of West Indies cricket. Governance reform is critical to ensuring our organization’s growth, sustainability, and ability to inspire pride across the region. This moment required unity and collaboration, and their absence undermines the collective effort required to move forward."
Full StoryThis is Comedy Central
So what you gonna do? Haul dem before the disciplinary committee and fine dem ....
In reply to Kay
GCB and BCA got issues with the current administration for a while now... don't think that will change anytime soon.
Think it started with the whole Bassarath illegal vote thing.
In reply to anthonyp
Both Guyana and Barbados are out of order.
In reply to Chrissy
BCA taking the lead from their leader.
Dem doh give a fuck bout nothing but what in Barbados interests
Little wonder Reifer has yet to respond to CWI
The contempt shown here by both boards is beyond out of order.
In reply to imusic
Reifer has responded via his lawyer
In reply to nissan
Is WIPA still the players representative?
Isn’t their a CBA between CWI and WIPA?
Is this lawyer appointed by WIPA? Or BCA? Or Reifer just got independent counsel?
Usually in matters such as this, it is the player representative (WIPA) that acts on behalf of the player.
In reply to imusic
Who's else interest should Barbados be concerned with?
The BCA should be supporting it's team and management in this situation.
I hope that is what they do.
Unsurprising response
In reply to imusic
A fuck you say…..please, make that two fucks thank you.
I'm puzzled, truly.
For years men saying bruk up CWI. It's dis, dat or the odda! Now Guy and Bar step up to the plate and dem get deem out of order? Really?
Yet on other threads we foaming at the mouth over Barkley's position on WI cricket?
Search
Live Scores
- no matches