debut: 4/28/03
60,908 runs
In reply to anthonyp
There is room for such a selection. Should not be the norm.
There is room for such a selection. Should not be the norm.
- edited -
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
Rutherford for Greaves Please!
debut: 11/2/09
13,015 runs
In reply to natty_forever
Not at the moment. Full preference is being given to the hand picked ones by the coach.
Based on the last regional tournament only Campbell could find a spot in the XI... what happen to the other top performers?
Not at the moment. Full preference is being given to the hand picked ones by the coach.
Based on the last regional tournament only Campbell could find a spot in the XI... what happen to the other top performers?
debut: 1/12/06
9,514 runs
If those who played didn't perform, they shouldn't feel sleighted if someone who didn't takes their spot
- edited -
debut: 4/28/03
60,908 runs
In reply to anthonyp
Ìn his defence, he wants experienced players for now. I feel he will make changes over time, once these, FC players, continue to perform.
Ìn his defence, he wants experienced players for now. I feel he will make changes over time, once these, FC players, continue to perform.
- edited -
debut: 3/1/21
890 runs
In reply to DIEHARD
Stop the nonsense. What record are you talking about? How does their first class / test record stack up against Paint's?
Stop the nonsense. What record are you talking about? How does their first class / test record stack up against Paint's?
debut: 3/1/21
890 runs
In reply to bird
We are not in the 70s and 80s. There in no need for us to depend only on our first class season to determine if a player is ready. All the available evidence should be considered.
We are not in the 70s and 80s. There in no need for us to depend only on our first class season to determine if a player is ready. All the available evidence should be considered.
debut: 11/2/09
13,015 runs
In reply to WalterWhite
How many of them had the opportunity to play 100 tests whilst failing and not having to worry about their spot on the team?
Kraigg is the worst player in the history of WI cricket to play 100 test matches... probably in world cricket.
The dude averaging around 20 for the past 3-4+ years and yet yall going on like he's irreplaceable.
How many of them had the opportunity to play 100 tests whilst failing and not having to worry about their spot on the team?
Kraigg is the worst player in the history of WI cricket to play 100 test matches... probably in world cricket.
The dude averaging around 20 for the past 3-4+ years and yet yall going on like he's irreplaceable.
debut: 3/1/21
890 runs
In reply to anthonyp
Yet you are not naming a player who is breaking down the door to take his spot.
Until that happens Paint stays.
Yet you are not naming a player who is breaking down the door to take his spot.
Until that happens Paint stays.
debut: 11/2/09
13,015 runs
In reply to WalterWhite
Which part of anybody don't you get?
They could even go with a 10yr old... they won't do worse!
Which part of anybody don't you get?
They could even go with a 10yr old... they won't do worse!
debut: 11/2/09
13,015 runs
In reply to WalterWhite
Yep.. thankfully only you know about cricket.
How hard is it for a 10yr old to go out there and score a single? Right away he's outperforming that waste..
Yep.. thankfully only you know about cricket.
How hard is it for a 10yr old to go out there and score a single? Right away he's outperforming that waste..
Forums:
The Rum Shop
The Back Room
Search
Live Scores
- no matches